Security of Tenure and
Land Registration in Africa:
Literature Review and Synthesis
Carol W. Dickerman, with Grenville Barnes, John W. Bruce, Joy K. Green, Greg
Myers, Richard Polishuk, Douglas Stienbarger, Andrew Sund
LTC Paper 137
December 2005, 372 pp., 14.23 MB (originally published in 1989)
Retrieve FULL TEXT in Adobe Acrobat format
| To save document directly to your computer for later viewing or printing, hold down the <shift> key while you click on the above link. | |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader software is required to read and print this document. If you do not have Acrobat Reader already, you can download free software now. | |
ABSTRACT: In 1984, the Land Tenure Center embarked on a project to evaluate
the experiences with land registration and tenure reform in Africa . The goal
was to determine is African states been able to use tenure reform and land registration
to provide greater security of tenure than was available through customary tenure
systems. Donor agencies focused attention on the creation of individual freehold
title, emphasizing the heightened security of holding, marketability, and access
to credit under such tenure. National governments, on the other hand, were more
concerned to see that land was used productively rather than merely accumulated
for purposes of prestige or inheritance or as a hedge against inflation, and
for this reason have tended to favor granting more circumscribed rights, such
as leaseholds or rights of occupancy. This literature review and synthesis was
prepared as part of an effort to increase very substantially our knowledge,
especially on a quantitative level, of tenure and development relationships
in Africa . The literature review is an attempt to gather in one place data
about the diverse efforts at land registration and to describe briefly for each
country the various registration programs that have taken place (if any), why
they were undertaken, and what subsequent studies of these programs have found.
Among other things, it will be seen that the intended benefits, and beneficiaries,
of land registration have changed over the century or so since the first systems
were put in place. In addition to these variations over time, there are also
differences among Anglophone, Francophone, and Lusophone countries, differences
that not only influenced the structure of registration systems established during
the colonial era, but also continue to inform the kinds of registration systems
adopted today.
Keywords: land registration -- Africa; land titling -- Africa; customary tenure -- Africa; national land policies -- Africa.
![]()
Return to Publications Page
Return to LTC Home Page
![]()
Full text document also posted at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu, courtesy of AgEcon Search: Research in Agricultural Economics
Please send questions or comments regarding this web page to